Peer review on Si Si WA2

The introduction paragraph is interesting as it coupled with a proverb which makes the reader ponders of what the future will be. Furthermore, the thesis statement is clearly stated. In addition, the background information of this essay is well introduced. However, a brief introduction of the other 5 reactors is encouraged to give the reader better understanding of the current research and development.

The body paragraph is well written in the sense that each paragraph is focusing on one idea followed by opposing argument in the next paragraph. Each of the idea and opposing argument is well supported by evidence. However, there are a few mistakes for the in-text citation. In addition, the second idea of SCWR being of good performance and the opposing argument is VHTR being of high efficiency due to high operating temperature that leads to safety and stability issues is inappropriate. I would suggest comparing the level of efficiency based on projected statistical data.

The conclusion paragraph is well indicated with a transition phrase to indicate that the essay is coming to an end. Moreover, the paragraph also contains a brief summary and restatement of the essay two main ideas on the chosen reactors. The last sentence is an question which allows the reader to reconsider the feasibility of nuclear power. It is an interesting way of ending the essay.

As a whole, there are a few grammatical errors and sentence structure inaccuracies. However, the overall of this essay is cohesive with interesting points are covered with clear supporting evidence to convince the reader of the advantages of nuclear power.